<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Experiment in Redesigning about:mozilla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toolness.com/wp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532</link>
	<description>The Blog of Atul Varma</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla: The Big Picture at Toolness</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-2532</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla: The Big Picture at Toolness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-2532</guid>
		<description>[...] inside to use images as a way of understanding what&#8217;s going on at Mozilla&#8212;sort of like about:mozilla, but using pictures instead of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] inside to use images as a way of understanding what&#8217;s going on at Mozilla&mdash;sort of like about:mozilla, but using pictures instead of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abi</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1637</link>
		<dc:creator>Abi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1637</guid>
		<description>I like the second version better. But just a minor thing -  you should invert the colors for the header in the second version, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the second version better. But just a minor thing -  you should invert the colors for the header in the second version, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redesigning Planets and Project Dashboards at Toolness</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1625</link>
		<dc:creator>Redesigning Planets and Project Dashboards at Toolness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1625</guid>
		<description>[...] GuildPal 0.3             &#171; An Experiment in Redesigning about:mozilla [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GuildPal 0.3             &laquo; An Experiment in Redesigning about:mozilla [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atul</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>Atul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I think I may not have been explicit enough about one of the assumptions about this design, which is that it was made to scroll horizontally rather than vertically. Some of you have made good points about how this can be more inconvenient for people, though--although I think some of them can be remedied through hackery, e.g. by capturing keypresses of the spacebar and scrolling horizontally.

@Christian: What I really meant by "resolution-independent" was that the page literally be independent of pixel resolution, because pixel resolution alone doesn't mean anything for end-users: a character that's 10 pixels tall could be eminently readable on one 15-inch display and microscopic on another. On the other hand, points say something very specific about the physical size of something: books on typography, whether for print or otherwise, always state that 9pt is pretty readable.  So unless a reader actually has poor vision, I'd prefer for the text to appear the same size whether it's on an iPhone or a laptop screen.

@Kim and @Dorus: I'm currently playing around with CSS3 columns, but I'm finding them very difficult to use; for one thing, the specification of &lt;tt&gt;-moz-column-width&lt;/tt&gt; doesn't appear to be accurate, as it seems impossible for me to align e.g. a visual element with the second column of a passage of text. Hmm.

Regarding the use of JS, this is just an experiment, and it's easiest for me to use all the cutting-edge tools at my disposal. Should it ever become the "new" layout for about:mozilla, I'd definitely set things up so that the page could be easily viewed with JS turned off. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I think I may not have been explicit enough about one of the assumptions about this design, which is that it was made to scroll horizontally rather than vertically. Some of you have made good points about how this can be more inconvenient for people, though&#8211;although I think some of them can be remedied through hackery, e.g. by capturing keypresses of the spacebar and scrolling horizontally.</p>
<p>@Christian: What I really meant by &#8220;resolution-independent&#8221; was that the page literally be independent of pixel resolution, because pixel resolution alone doesn&#8217;t mean anything for end-users: a character that&#8217;s 10 pixels tall could be eminently readable on one 15-inch display and microscopic on another. On the other hand, points say something very specific about the physical size of something: books on typography, whether for print or otherwise, always state that 9pt is pretty readable.  So unless a reader actually has poor vision, I&#8217;d prefer for the text to appear the same size whether it&#8217;s on an iPhone or a laptop screen.</p>
<p>@Kim and @Dorus: I&#8217;m currently playing around with CSS3 columns, but I&#8217;m finding them very difficult to use; for one thing, the specification of <tt>-moz-column-width</tt> doesn&#8217;t appear to be accurate, as it seems impossible for me to align e.g. a visual element with the second column of a passage of text. Hmm.</p>
<p>Regarding the use of JS, this is just an experiment, and it&#8217;s easiest for me to use all the cutting-edge tools at my disposal. Should it ever become the &#8220;new&#8221; layout for about:mozilla, I&#8217;d definitely set things up so that the page could be easily viewed with JS turned off. <img src='http://www.toolness.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorus</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>Kim Sullivan beat me to it, but why not use -moz-column-gap and
-moz-column-width? I know of at least one &lt;a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2005/03/gecko_18_for_we.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;mozilla blogger&lt;/a&gt; who uses that, and it makes his blog much more readable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim Sullivan beat me to it, but why not use -moz-column-gap and<br />
-moz-column-width? I know of at least one <a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2005/03/gecko_18_for_we.html" rel="nofollow">mozilla blogger</a> who uses that, and it makes his blog much more readable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomm Eriksen</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomm Eriksen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>I think Jakob Nielsens research from back in the day is still valid for this issue - "Users hate horizontal scrolling": http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050711.html

It also "breaks" the spacebar as a shortcut to scroll to more content. Something I use all the time when reading long pages like: http://planet.mozilla.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jakob Nielsens research from back in the day is still valid for this issue - &#8220;Users hate horizontal scrolling&#8221;: <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050711.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050711.html</a></p>
<p>It also &#8220;breaks&#8221; the spacebar as a shortcut to scroll to more content. Something I use all the time when reading long pages like: <a href="http://planet.mozilla.org/" rel="nofollow">http://planet.mozilla.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>The new version shows a completely white page if JS is turned off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new version shows a completely white page if JS is turned off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>I have javascript turned off (noscript), and I only get a completely black page. Redesigning an official mozilla newsletter in a way that makes impossible to view without javascript isn't too nice. If you really want columns (although the disadvantages with regards to scrolling have already been pointed out), why not try something with CSS -moz-column and -webkit-column and make the site gracefully degrade in browsers that don't support it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have javascript turned off (noscript), and I only get a completely black page. Redesigning an official mozilla newsletter in a way that makes impossible to view without javascript isn&#8217;t too nice. If you really want columns (although the disadvantages with regards to scrolling have already been pointed out), why not try something with CSS -moz-column and -webkit-column and make the site gracefully degrade in browsers that don&#8217;t support it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Sonne</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Sonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>"In an attempt to make it somewhat resolution-independent, the CSS doesn’t use pixels as a measurement unit for anything other than borders; everything else is specified in points and ems."

I'd note that like px, pt is an absolute unit, which should only really be used for print media. So while it might be independent on resolution, it'll be dependent on screen/window-size (and you can't really count on a minimum width here.)

-- cers / Christian Sonne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In an attempt to make it somewhat resolution-independent, the CSS doesn’t use pixels as a measurement unit for anything other than borders; everything else is specified in points and ems.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d note that like px, pt is an absolute unit, which should only really be used for print media. So while it might be independent on resolution, it&#8217;ll be dependent on screen/window-size (and you can&#8217;t really count on a minimum width here.)</p>
<p>&#8211; cers / Christian Sonne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon P. Hemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon P. Hemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=532#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>It's also important (I think) to keep in mind that some (many?) people read the about:mozilla newsletter via e-mail.

Although, the e-mail newsletter is formatted a lot more than the web page that you linked to. Perhaps that's because it's merely a feed, without formatting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also important (I think) to keep in mind that some (many?) people read the about:mozilla newsletter via e-mail.</p>
<p>Although, the e-mail newsletter is formatted a lot more than the web page that you linked to. Perhaps that&#8217;s because it&#8217;s merely a feed, without formatting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
